JPFO works to destroy so-called "gun control" (code words for disarming innocent people), exposing misguided notions that lead people to seek so-called "gun control," and we encourage Americans to understand and defend all the Bill of Rights for all citizens.
JPFO OFFERS — "STICKERS WITH MEANING"
Recent News and Opinion
 |
A Short History of Bans on Possession of Firearms in Federal FacilitiesBy Dean Weingarten. May 28, 2025Laws banning the carry or possession of weapons in government buildings are a very late addition to the United States of America. At the time of the ratification of the Bill of Rights, including the 2A... [...] |
 |
Let's Open The ''Gun-Control'' PlaybookBy Charles C. W. Cooke. May 26, 2025Politics—especially when individual liberty is at stake—are an endless struggle. Lazy, ideological minds return bad ideas to us over and over again. The falsehoods and logical fallacies from 'gun-control' marketers are repackaged and sold again. [...] |
 |
Five Things Trump Admin is Doing and Will Do on GunsBy Susanne Edward. May 23, 2025While the Biden administration spent four years vilifying lawful gun owners and tying the hands of law enforcement, President Donald Trump (R) has unapologetically flipped the script - [...] |
 |
Bombshell Allegation: Anti-gunners Offered to Pay for Hammer SilenceBy Dave Workman. May 21, 2025Tucked seven pages into the federal lawsuit filed by former National Rifle Association President Marion Hammer against the organization she served for more than 40 years is a bombshell allegation ... [...] |
 |
DOJ deal ends ban on forced-reset triggers. 'Gun control' advocates are alarmedBy Alanna Durkin Richer. May 19, 2025The Trump administration will allow the sale of forced-reset triggers, which make semiautomatic rifles fire more rapidly, with the federal government ending a ban as part of a settlement that also requires it to return seized devices. [...] |
 |
Opinion: SCOTUS rejection tells anti-gun states it's OK to ignore Bruen decisionBy Roger Katz. May 16, 2025If you haven't yet read Arbalest Quarrel's deep dive into the Supreme Court's failure to take up Antonyuk v. James, do so soon. You'll see how high the stakes really are. This companion piece isn't meant to replace it. [...] |
For earlier alerts -
go to the alerts index page.