Do Gun Control Activists Pad
Gun Death Statistics?
By Wendy McElroy
Originally published March 3, 2004 on
iFeminists.Com
Last week's release of
police documents and evidence
on the April, 1999, Columbine school shootings has sparked many questions --
not only on the specifics of Columbine but also on the general issue of guns.
The answers are unsatisfying on all counts.
Take, for example, the issue of how many children die each year in gun-related
incidents. That question has been prompted not just by the new Columbine
evidence, but by the impending Million
Mom March on Washington, D.C., planned for Mother's Day.
The first anti-gun MMM in 2000 attempted to redirect the focus of Mother's Day
from flowers and card giving to the gun deaths of children. The 2004 event
continues this focus as its
press release reminds us, "[W]ith memories of the horrible events
at Columbine High School ... people gathered [in 2000] on the Mall in
Washington, D.C., to demand saner gun policies." The release quotes Mary
Leigh Blek, the "president emeritus" of MMM, as saying that almost
14,000 children "have died from gun violence" since "our last
march."
Where does that figure come from?
To begin with, Blek is probably referring to the 2000 MMM event. (In
2001, only about 100 people participated and the event is now virtually
ignored.) This means she is stating that almost 14,000 children died from gun
violence between 2000 and 2004. The figure is almost certainly an extrapolation
from prior data.
The definitive source for data on injury-death in America, including gun deaths,
is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Taking relevant data
for 2001, the latest year available, and multiplying the results by four should
provide a figure close to 14,000.
During 2001, the CDC reported a total of 157,078 injury-deaths. On their
interactive Web site, if you click "Firearm" under
"Cause of Injury," the figure becomes 29,573. For deaths in children,
click on <1 as the lowest in the age range and 17 as the highest. Also
select the "No Age-Adjusting Requested" option. The figure becomes
1,433. Multiplied by four, this is 5,732, or roughly 40 percent of what MMM
asserts.
The 5,732 includes at least two categories of death that do not clearly belong
because they do not clearly support MMM's anti-gun arguments. That is to say,
MMM's use of death statistics coupled with calls for legislative control as a
"solution" unmistakably implies that the cited deaths could have been
prevented by gun control. It is misleading, therefore, to include deaths that
would probably have occurred whether gun laws and, in some cases, whether guns
themselves -- were present.
Maria Heil of the pro-gun Second Amendment
Sisters comments on one of the misleading categories: "They [MMM]
are not upfront that over half of those deaths are suicides. Suicide is not
committed because there is a gun. Studies show that our suicide rate is on par
with other industrialized nations, including ones with very strictly regulated
guns."
Guns are merely one of many methods available.
The 5,732 also includes deaths that result from gang activity in which the guns
are usually illegal. These deaths would not have been prevented by gun control
any more than gang members' drug use is prevented by drug laws.
The honest question for anti-gun advocates is, how many children's deaths were
"caused" by a lack of gun control?
The easiest way to reduce both suicides and gang deaths from swelling that
answer is to eliminate teenagers from the data; both suicide and gang
membership are overwhelmingly teen rather than "child" phenomena.
(Moreover, "child" traditionally refers to someone who is
pre-pubescent, pre-teen. That's the image invoked by MMM's references to
"children" and to "playgrounds.")
Changing the age parameters on the CDC site to register the gun deaths of
children between <1 and 12 years old renders the number, 223 for 2001.
Multiplied by four, this becomes 892 or about 6 percent of MMM's asserted
figure. Anti-gun advocates should be stating that, between 2000 and 2004, the
gun deaths of 892 children could have been avoided through gun control or
prohibition. With valid statistics that are properly used, real debate could
then begin.
The figure of 14,000 child gun deaths closes off the possibility of honest
debate. Indeed, the only way to arrive at that number at the CDC site is to
include suicides and gang-related deaths, and to define a child as "anyone
under the age of 21." In short, MMM has padded the statistics.
The death of any child is tragic and should not be diminished, but neither
should it be used to political advantage. I believe this is what MMM is doing.
MMM hopes to create a groundswell of public outrage against guns. But, MMM
should reconsider the inflation and skewing of statistics on dead children. As
a strategy, it looks cruel and heartless and could easily backfire.
Visit our article
archive for more articles by Wendy McElroy
